obama or mccain?

Derek · 06-29-2008, 07:38 PM

EASY EASY EASY....

People should be able to have a conversation and disagree without resorting to name calling. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and just because you do not agree doesn't mean you need to belittle the oter individual.

As for spelling Krispy you may want to go back and proof read a few of you own post before you begin bashing others for poor grammer. Yours is far from english teacher level.

If you want to be a spelling nazi then you better be perfect yourself.

Z · 06-29-2008, 08:26 PM

Chris if that is all you got in your defense is my lack of spellcheck then you need to take a step back.
All I have to say is this. Thank god the world doesnt think like you do. If that were the case, this world would be torn apart more so than it is now.

Spellcheck that bigot.

krispy · 06-30-2008, 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek

EASY EASY EASY....

As for spelling Krispy you may want to go back and proof read a few of you own post before you begin bashing others for poor grammer. Yours is far from english teacher level.

If you want to be a spelling nazi then you better be perfect yourself.

Yeah...................

trigeek5 · 06-30-2008, 08:15 AM

Krispy,

As a catholic I am opposed to abortion. But I seem to remember that God had this thing about "FREE WILL." I am not going to stop somone from doing something to their own body. I can oppose it though. As for Gay marriage? I oppose it if it is not at a federal level. Otherwise, who cares? If someone is gay, they destroy your argument anyway. You cannot force a gay person straight. Despite what the Temple, Rome or the scientologists claim. But if municipalities, towns, counties or states decide law that carries over to a national level, that is wrong. If California continues with the gay marriages. Then the same thing will hapen that happened in Tennessee the first go around. A small county outlawed homosexuals.

The problem as I see it is that religion loves to tell us what to do. How to think and act. How to pray and to follow with blind faith. I do not believe you can have faith without having questioned that faith at some time. I see that you are strong in your faith and that is admirable and respectful. But an excess of faith leads to a weakening of senses it seems. hence 911.

GoatDad · 06-30-2008, 08:58 AM

Here's an interesting view of Obama and some things he's doing:

http://www.eyeblast.tv/Public/Video.aspx?rsrcID=2036

krispy · 06-30-2008, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoatDad

Here's an interesting view of Obama and some things he's doing:

http://www.eyeblast.tv/Public/Video.aspx?rsrcID=2036

previously posted..........

krispy · 06-30-2008, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trigeek5

Krispy,

As a catholic I am opposed to abortion. But I seem to remember that God had this thing about "FREE WILL." I am not going to stop somone from doing something to their own body. I can oppose it though. As for Gay marriage? I oppose it if it is not at a federal level. Otherwise, who cares? If someone is gay, they destroy your argument anyway. You cannot force a gay person straight. Despite what the Temple, Rome or the scientologists claim. But if municipalities, towns, counties or states decide law that carries over to a national level, that is wrong. If California continues with the gay marriages. Then the same thing will hapen that happened in Tennessee the first go around. A small county outlawed homosexuals.

The problem as I see it is that religion loves to tell us what to do. How to think and act. How to pray and to follow with blind faith. I do not believe you can have faith without having questioned that faith at some time. I see that you are strong in your faith and that is admirable and respectful. But an excess of faith leads to a weakening of senses it seems. hence 911.

Don't have two much fun deciphering the following:

Time to perfekt my spelling and gramar. So, here we have from my point of view religious dogma. But on the other hand, it is according to Z, trigeek, and others, political dogma, hence what has been termed in here as being a bigot. It appears that people, at least on this site, and apearantly worldwide, view that if the masses (not the catholic masses, but polotics) have the opinion that something should be set by law, then and only then, is it not ok. Otherwise, since I'm not breaking the law, it can't hurt me, or won't hurt the people around me. At least that is my understanding of what is being said. Just words..... Just words...

P.S.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z

Edit: I had this nice responce typed out and posted then I realised that Bigots dont listen.

Sounds like you may be a bigot yourself. However, I am not namecalling, just stating something that may be true.

trigeek5 · 07-01-2008, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krispy

Don't have two much fun deciphering the following:

Time to perfekt my spelling and gramar. So, here we have from my point of view religious dogma. But on the other hand, it is according to Z, trigeek, and others, political dogma, hence what has been termed in here as being a bigot. It appears that people, at least on this site, and apearantly worldwide, view that if the masses (not the catholic masses, but polotics) have the opinion that something should be set by law, then and only then, is it not ok. Otherwise, since I'm not breaking the law, it can't hurt me, or won't hurt the people around me. At least that is my understanding of what is being said. Just words..... Just words...

P.S.

Sounds like you may be a bigot yourself. However, I am not namecalling, just stating something that may be true.

when did I call you a bigot? when did I personally attack you? You are the one labeling people now. I do not see anyone breaking down your door and forcing you to be anything than what you choose to be. I do not give a shit about grammar. I know mine isn't the best. But now your casting stones. Oh but wasn't there something about being with out sin? So apparently Krispy or chris is our moral superior and is the only one of us that can have an opinion. All I did was offer my view. And like so many others in your mind set. You cannot debate but attack. I won't call you a bigot but zealot seems to fit.

krispy · 07-01-2008, 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trigeek5

when did I call you a bigot? when did I personally attack you? You are the one labeling people now. I do not see anyone breaking down your door and forcing you to be anything than what you choose to be. I do not give a shit about grammar. I know mine isn't the best. But now your casting stones. Oh but wasn't there something about being with out sin? So apparently Krispy or chris is our moral superior and is the only one of us that can have an opinion. All I did was offer my view. And like so many others in your mind set. You cannot debate but attack. I won't call you a bigot but zealot seems to fit.

You may want to re-read my last post. I never called you a bigot. And I havn't done any name calling. But thanks for your name calling, apparntly I'm in a mind set and a zealot....

Debate... thats what I'm doing.....

trigeek5 · 07-01-2008, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krispy

But on the other hand, it is according to Z, trigeek, and others, political dogma, hence what has been termed in here as being a bigot.

that is lumping me with them. to me your views are to the right of what I believe. law made by man governs man. I can't say I agree with all the laws and non-existance of laws. But I do not believe that I have the right to rule over any one person because of my belief's. I also do not feel as though I have the right to debate the evils of a heavenly laws as you seem to have. There was a guy just like that who did that once. But we kicked his ass in world war 2. If we learned anything from that it was that radical viws, like bin ladens even. Lead to zealotous actions undertaken by weak minded people of blind faith.